Antonio
Gramsci
Antonio
Gramsci [ 1891 - 1937 ] was an
Italian anarchist, chief theoretician of the Communist Party and a
subversive. He worked out that the "inevitable" revolution
of the proletariat
predicted by orthodox Marxism had not occurred by the early 20th
century. His answer was to subvert the Christian culture which
promotes normal values. This means
infiltrating society from the top down. Marx advocated doing it from
the bottom up. 'Workers of the world unite. You have nothing
to
lose but your chains' - It sounded good but didn't quite work. Taking
over the education industry especially the universities is a major
part of the attack.
The crucial aspect is owning or at least
controlling the main stream media. Look at who has Media
Power and Media Control. The destruction of civilization can
then
be
achieved by inciting homosexuality, feminism, illegal immigration,
pandering to foreign undesirables, encouraging people to take on huge
debts through mortgages so that they can be broken by rising interest
rates etc. Look at the BBC's output and you will understand their
agenda. Commercial television is also designed to pervert.
Long
March Through The Institutions
Infiltrating the Church, law, government and everything else that makes a
country work is the key step in destroying it. Marxists have done it and
destruction proceeds apace.
Doctor Yates knows the problem. Understanding
the enemy is a major step in the right direction.
Innocents
Clubs
Are clubs for the well meaning, who
are eager to believe the best of anyone who can be depicted as a
victim of British Imperialism or something else they don't like. The Church of England is
a de facto
enemy, full of good will to all men unless, perhaps they are English.
The innocents are very keen on promoting the idea of racism, the idea
that we oppress foreigners. But there is no level playing field in
this concept. Blacks are allowed to hate us. Blacks must be pandered
to. Innocents Clubs
is the term
coined by Willi
Münzenberg who
was talent spotted by Lenin in Switzerland.
Entryism
QUOTE
Entryism is a political tactic by
which an organisation encourages members to infiltrate
another organisation in an attempt to gain recruits, or take
over entirely. In situations where
the organisation being "entered" is hostile to entryism, the
entryists may engage in a degree of subterfuge to hide the
fact that they are, in fact, an organisation in their own
right........ Other entryist groups have gone to the extent
of hiding both their political views and their
organisational existence......... Entryism is often
(but not always) done secretly and often in organisations
run on
democratic centralist lines. Entryism is seen by some as
a logical conclusion from
Leninist political theory which postulates that a
"revolutionary vanguard" can successfully foment a
revolution within a larger
capitalist society, but according to some, the strategy
of entryism is as old as politics itself.
UNQUOTE
It means infiltration. Her Majesty's Government is a victim. So is England.
One of the guilty is Miliband, son of a communist subversive and grandson of
a mass murderer. He is now in the Cabinet and was mentioned by the BBC as a
possible prime minister. Notice the sneer; he is an arrogant rogue.
Deep Entryism
QUOTE
Deep entryism/entryism 'sui
generis'
In these types of entryism, entryists engage in
a long-term perspective in which they work within an organisation for
decades in hopes of gaining influence and a degree of power and perhaps even
control of the larger organisation. In 'entryism sui generis' (of a special
type), Trotskyists, for example, do not openly argue for the building of a
Trotskyist party. 'Deep entryism' refers to the long duration..........
UNQUOTE
The idea is entirely straightforward; infiltrating for the long term. In
espionage they are called sleepers and are activated by their handlers when
wanted. The Wiki does not bother to point out that there has been a broad
front penetration of civilization using this approach. The BBC is totally
dominated by such. Invisible Enemy, a book
by Edward Abboud tells us about it and names names.
Gramsci's
Legacy
Ideas are more dangerous
than
weapons because they control men's minds and actions. Here are some
spread by the education industry and the media.
There is no truth,
only competing agendas.
All Western (and especially American)
claims to moral superiority over Communism/Fascism/Islam are vitiated
by the West’s history of racism and colonialism:-
1. There
are no objective standards by which we may judge one culture to be
better than another. Anyone who claims that there are such standards
is an evil oppressor.
2. The prosperity of the West is built on
ruthless exploitation of the Third World; therefore Westerners
actually deserve to be impoverished and miserable.
3. Crime is
the fault of society, not the individual criminal. Poor criminals are
entitled to what they take. Submitting to criminal predation is more
virtuous than resisting it.
4. The poor are victims. Criminals
are victims. And only victims are virtuous. Therefore only the poor
and criminals are virtuous. (Rich people can borrow some virtue by
identifying with poor people and criminals.)
5. For a virtuous
person, violence and war are never justified. It is always better to
be a victim than to fight, or even to defend oneself. But
‘oppressed’
people are allowed to use violence anyway; they are merely reflecting
the evil of their oppressors.
6. When confronted with terror, the
only moral course for a Westerner is to apologize for past sins,
understand the terrorist’s point of view, and make
concessions.
These ideas have been released into the wild but have a virtue.
When they are stated clearly and looked in the eye they are quite
clearly false or misguided but they do have an attraction for a
certain type of mind.
Gramsci's
Grand Plan
Father Thornton explain how
Gramsci decided to destroy civilization. The Church was good on
analysis. Their follow through has not been effective.
QUOTE
Gramsci
believed that if Communism achieved "mastery of human
consciousness," then labour camps and mass murder would be
unnecessary. How does an ideology gain such mastery over
patterns of
thought inculcated by cultures for hundreds of years? Mastery over
the consciousness of the great mass of people would be
attained,
Gramsci contended, if Communists
or their sympathizers gained control of the organs of
culture--churches, education, newspapers, magazines,
the electronic
media, serious literature, music, the visual arts, and so on.
By winning "cultural
hegemony"
to use Gramsci's own term, Communism would control
the deepest
wellsprings of human thought and imagination. One
need not even control all of the information itself if one can
gain control over the minds that assimilate that information.
Under such conditions, serious
opposition disappears
since men are no longer capable of grasping the arguments of
Marxism's opponents.
Men will indeed "love
their servitude," and will not even realize that it is
servitude.
UNQUOTE
That seems clear enough as a description of
what is being done to us. The BBC, the object of my particular
loathing is in the forefront of telling us that Englishmen are
inferior to blacks and that we owe it to them to let them get away
with murder, rape, et cetera.
Errors & omissions, broken
links, cock ups,
over-emphasis, malice [ real or imaginary ] or whatever; if you find
any I am open to comment.
Email
me at Mike Emery.
All
financial contributions are cheerfully accepted. If you want to keep
it private, use my PGP
key. Home
Updated
on Wednesday, 20 August 2008 15:48:17