Culture Wars

Culture wars are about destroying a country by destroying its culture, its identity, its history and sense of shared worth. It is being done to us deliberately, slowly, insidiously and maliciously by post Marxists with an agenda; the destruction of civilization. What do they think will replace it? I do not know. Do they? Perhaps they are just driven by hatred,  envy and Western Guilt. Marxists believed what Marx had to say and sent over 85 million people to their deaths. Post Marxists are followers of Antonio Gramsci, the chief theoretician of the communist party who decided that it would be easier to destroy civilization from the top down rather than Marx's way from the bottom up. This means infiltrating all of country's institutions, especially education and the media. This is thought control for real; they call it the The Long March Through The Institutions. Marxist propaganda was crude. The post Marxist version is more subtle and far more dangerous as a result.

The media attack is wide ranging. It is operating throughout Christendom and involves three main fronts, language, news and entertainment. It has an advantage for us. We can do something about it. Read down for more.

 

Cultural Genocide
Means destroying a culture by taking over its institutions especially the main stream media. They suppress history and feed people a corrupt version. It also means flooding a place  with foreign undesirables; anything to destroy unity.

Language
The post Marxist disciples of Antonio Gramsci have taken control of English. Homosexuals are now gays and pushed at every opportunity. The BBC are very enthusiastic about this one. It is for their own private interests. They have an especial loathing of racism if they are accusing Englishmen. Blacks get a pass on this one no matter what.

 

News
Individual news items can be reported fairly accurately and honestly. Suppressing matters that they don't  want us to know about can always be excused. National news cannot cover everything. The agenda is there and working flat out against us.

 

Entertainment
This is the most insidious part of media subversion. The Archers were every day country folk. Not any more. The BBC line would be that they are part of a vibrant, multicultural Britain.

 

Charlton Heston Speaks - Winning The Cultural War
Charlton Heston is an American actor who came in for big roles. But he was more. He flew from England as a gunner during the war years when flying was not so safe as it is now. He speaks and he speaks well.

 

Christmas Under Attack
Perhaps you have noticed that there are people who talk about Happy Holidays. There are others who push Hanukah and the entirely fraudulent Kwanza. Could there be reasons, an agenda? It certainly looks like it.

This web site owes its origin to Sean Gabb, the leading theoretician of the right in England and a libertarian. You can find him at www.seangabb.co.uk. You can find his writing at Free Life. Here is a sample.

The Ideology of the New Ruling Class
We have in this country a new ruling class. It is no longer the Monarchy and the network of land-owning and mercantile interests that clustered around it, or anything identifiable as the old—alleged—working class movement that competed with them. Instead, we are ruled by a coalition of politicians, bureaucrats, lawyers, academics, media people, and businessmen who look to an enlarged state as the source of their income or status. When it came to power is hard to say with precision.

It had taken over the ideological state apparatus long before the 1997 general election that gave it formal political office; and that election result more intensified than redirected the course of events. Undoubtedly, though, it is now supreme.

The ideology this ruling class has taken up to produce internal unity and to justify itself before the ruled has nothing to do with the national past or the currently perceived interests of the majority. It is incidentally about regulating everything that moves in the interests of health and safety, and sometimes banning them, and incidentally about preventing alleged dangers to the environment, and incidentally about making us all into the subjects of a centralised European state. But these are only incidentals. They are not the core ideology. Though it has not entirely broken with the past, and though it may appeal to tradition as convenience requires, the new ruling class defines its basis of legitimacy lies in the proclaimed right and ability to bring about a transformation of the country into something entirely new. The old ethnic and cultural homogeneity are seen as evils. In their place, we are to have “a rich diversity of communities”. Some of these are to be sexual, some religious. But the real passion is for ethnic diversity. To take one instance of this, in 1998, the Government set up a Commission on the Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain. Its purpose was to analyse the current state of multi-ethnic Britain and propose ways of countering racial discrimination and disadvantage and making Britain a confident and vibrant multicultural society at ease with its rich diversity.3

Chaired by Bhikhu Parekh, an academic placed in the House of Lords by Tony Blair, the Commission was a sub-division of the Runnymede Trust, a formally private body “devoted to promoting racial justice in Britain”. Its Report can be seen as a digested expression of the transformation intended for this country. Among the recommendations were a formal declaration by the State that Britain was now a “multicultural society”, and a commitment that deep-rooted antagonisms to racial and cultural differences [should be] defeated in practice, as well as symbolically written out of the national story.4

3 Report of the Commission on the Future of Multi-Ethnic